Advocates worry Supreme Court ruling could grow to be an antiabortion tool

The Supreme Court’s new choice that California can prohibit revenue of pork from pigs retained in small cages was celebrated by advocates of animal legal rights and supporters of the state’s authority to implement legislation based mostly on Californians’ ethical views, even if they might impact other states. But authorized analysts say the ruling could possibly be utilized to other troubles that divide the states — for instance, abortion.

By the identical logic, could a point out like Alabama bar in-condition gross sales of products from a condition like California that supports the correct to attain an abortion? Or prosecute a California doctor for mailing abortion capsules to a lady in Alabama?

Possibly so, says Mary Ziegler, a UC Davis legislation professor whose fields consist of reproductive health care and abortion.

When the court docket dominated May well 11 that California did not unduly interfere with interstate commerce by placing restrictions on food stuff solutions it would enable into the condition based mostly on its voters’ humanitarian concerns, that may possibly make it more challenging to argue that an antiabortion state that minimize off trade with California was unconstitutionally imposing its own procedures across point out strains, Ziegler mentioned.

Previous post Attorney who challenged Trump decline retires amid disciplinary probes
Next post Dutch govt collapses more than immigration coverage